AJ wrote > On Wednesday 14 June 2006 21:51, Josh Babcock wrote: > > Can't you just supply whatever property regarding the vacuum system that > > the instrument is looking for? > > He could (which ISTR I had to do for the Lightning) but I think it would > be > nice to have the "correct" system available too. Some aircraft have > multiple > types of the same instrument to provide emergency backups and providing > for > this is where the hacks start to get a bit messy I think. >
We really don't need to hack this one. Sure we could paper over this one with a few lines of Nasal, but that won't solve the underlying problem (minor but below the high standards we set ourselves, or I thought we did) Vivian _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
