On Wednesday 21 June 2006 13:03, Christian Mayer wrote:
> These functions can be great - when you know in advance (1) the number
> range, (2) the required error range and that you are (3) in a very tight
> loop that is (4) performance critical. So I'd leave them in.
Yes, but I doubt that I will identify an *inner* *loop* making use of
transcendental functions that are that unimportant for the physics that I
would consider using these functions.
If you want to keep them, please help me and review that patch I have posted a
few days ago. Please *verify* that the remaining functions do about the right
thing past converting them to something that is not even misscompiled.
If nobody helps here, I will finally remove them in a few days.
Greetings
Mathias
--
Mathias Fröhlich, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
