On Tuesday 04 July 2006 19:43, Josh Babcock wrote: > Joacim Persson wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Josh Babcock wrote: > >> This helo def does not seem to be producing any main rotor torque. > > > > Adjust the poweratpitch_0 parameter. (on tail rotor too) > > > > Those seven 11m long blades probably cost a bit more than 53kW to turn at > > 185 rpms even at zero pitch. =) > > > > But where do one find real data for that? :P Checklists perhaps? -- > > torque readouts on the panel during start up procedures? > > Well, I don't have any data for that number, and haven't played with it > yet. 53 Kw is a lot of power though, more than enough to run a house, > and the blades shouldn't have that much drag at 0 pitch. The 9800 Kw at > full power came from the 100% rating of all the engines running together. > > I have the POH, and eventually will be tuning number to normal operating > ranges and comparing them against power checklists.
The main shaft on the D model sees about 3 million inchlb of torque. I do not have the number for the super stallion. Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel