Hi, Heiko Schulz wrote: > But I see often people in forums and maillists, who > are asking for the Bo 105 - because the most people > are disapointed of tis realistic model- truth can be > so hard! They go then to MSFS - and are lost for > us. But in my opinion the flight model of MSFS has (in realistic mode) a big bug and it is nearly impossible to hover in a controlled manner. > But Flightgear want to be open for all - so we > should think about some helps for them. Why not a > possibility of arealistic grade: a level for the > beginners, a level for the better one and at last: the > full realistic model? > I can fully agree to this. > A real pilot will never beginn with full action of the > heli - he will slowly begin to handle the stick, maybe > then the pedals and then collective. But in flightgear > you have to start with all this! > > Yes, that is really a problem. But if we add an autopilot for the tail-rotor (or just the linear add of collective input to the pedals), than it should be much easier. You just center the pedals, add some collective and have only to control the stick. The height will be hold by the ground effect. > Please, don't see this as flame - see this as may > possibility for a better flieghtmodell for > helicopters. > No, I don't see this as flame. Far from it such an input is needed, to improve flightgear.
Maik ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
