Hi,
Quote Olaf Flebbe:
"
I think too that we have to support the plib branch
quite a while. The
idea to do the OSG switch in CVS head was that the OSG
developers do
not
have the efforts for porting features from branch back
to HEAD. So
please work in the pre-OSG branch until the
performance issue is
solved.
But please port changes back to mainline, when ready.
IMHO I think
users
should stick with the branch, until many more issues
are solved."
That's the point. It will need some time, when the OSG
is on the same level like plib. Why wasting time?
I mean not to stop the work on OSG - far from it!
But if we want FlightGear and OSG to get better we
need users - and we get them only with a next release.
And we need users because there a lot of things to do
- work on the weather as an example, work on the
different aircraft fdm's.
The currently version is a good one with very few
bugs.
There are much improvements done since april. For me
important: framerates are stable, the helicopter fdm
is more realistic than MSFS's, nice route manager
(could be the cutting edge for a FMS)- every day I'm
flying with FG I got more fun.
I would vote for a next release - a pre-OSG release!
;-)
Greetz
HHS
___________________________________________________________
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
