Dave,
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 18:13, Dave Perry wrote:
> Should we be updating OSG source from CVS now or are the most recent
> updates still coming out in tar balls?
I still use the prepared tarball.
But people report that osg CVS works well.
Given Robert Osfield wants to release a next version in december - at least
this is what I read on osg-users a while ago - I think I have enough todo
where I do not yet really need the cvs version.
Said that, the cvs version has a nice shadow implementation that will be one
of the first things I will make use of when osg-1.3 gets released ...
I believe that with osg-1.3 I will require that version. At the moment the
minimum requirement is the tarball I put on Martins ftp server.
If it does not compile with CVS, tell me please.
So if somebody wants to play with the current CVS's features it might be worth
a try, but I believe that I will stay on a stable version to not require a
osg rebuild every new morning :)
Greetings
Mathias
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
