On Thursday 07 December 2006 19:12, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > I do no longer agree, and I stop committing to the PLIB branch. > You, Mathias and I were the only ones committing to both branches. > Everyone else only committed to HEAD, no? And now I will also > only commit to HEAD. All my commits to HEAD work for PLIB, anyway, > and I intend to keep it at that. >
Just to clarify: I actually agree (quite strongly) that minimizing double commits is a good thing. New features and new aircraft should probably just go into HEAD, as that is the version that we want to push forward in the long run. If AI really remains the only change, your solution might be workable, but the longer we keep a branched version, the more likely it becomes that there will be more data restructuring. And then we might regret the decision to have dumped the CVS PLIB base directory. So from that perspective, I'd still argue to keep it for a while, albeit with minimum maintenance. ;-) Cheers, Durk ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
