Hi Curt,
"Curtis Olson" wrote:
> On 12/23/06, Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To quote another recent poster ...
>
> ... the above statement above is not completely accurate, and not accurately
> complete.
>
> You do have some great sounding talking points though.
:-))
> Where do you think the vmap support came from? How about the code to do an
> efficient TIN fit/simplification of the original gridded terrain data? I
> suspect there may be a few specific developers that might not appreciate how
> you trivially minimize their very important contributions to the core
> terragear code base.
I don't think that I'm minimizing contributions that have been
submitted in the _past_ (like those by David M. with further support by
Wiliam R. for example). I'm monitoring the development for 6 or 7 years
now and I think I don't have forgotten what's been happening in this
time frame.
But I'm talking about the _current_ situation, the "single point of
overload" which makes a long story even out of really small changes -
and I'm proposing a solution which, as I think, would make it easier to
return some live into the development of TerraGear _now_, without
putting more burden on you.
Nothing more,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
