* Martin Spott -- Sunday 21 January 2007:
> Well, I didn't experience any difficulties exchanging EMails with Tat and
> I'd call it a good habit to ask him before repeatingly removing a
> (small) part of his aircraft configuration.

Again: I did ask (see mail below). All others replied and either
allowed me to change it, or changed it themselves, or announced
that they'll changed it themselves with the next submission. Only
Tatsuhiro didn't respond. Maybe my mail got lost or he just didn't
see it. My mailbox is often filled, too, and I easily miss someone.
But as it's a matter of architecture, as the aircraft was *very*
new, and as the redundant code was very obviously just copied
from the A6M2, with no explicit intention behind it at all, I
just did what is necessary for a consistent fgfs.

m.






Subject: <key> def for "Propeller finer/coarser" in *-set.xml files
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:48:16 +0100
From: Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stuart Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
    Vivian Meazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
    Detlef FABER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
    Tatsuhiro NISHIOKA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
    Syd ADAMS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 
Hi,

I've noticed that not only old aircraft still define keys for
"Propeller coarser/finer", but that aircraft are still committed
with these obsolete overrides.

  c310                                  ... me  :-)
  A6M2, A6M2b                           ... Syd
  Ki-84                                 ... Tatsuhiro
  bf109, bf109g, f4u                    ... Detlef
  c182, c182-2dpanel, c182rg            ... Stuart
  hurricaneIIb, seafireIIIc, spitfireIIa  ... Vivian

Could you all please check if your aircraft *really* need this
override? Note that n/N is globally defined already in
$FG_ROOT/keyboard.xml. And global keys shouldn't get overridden
for no good reason, let alone when the meaning remains the same
anyway, or the binding is actually *worse*. (Many of the override
definitions don't even use the controls wrapper!)

I will fix the c310, and I've already fixed the c182 and
the c182-2dpanel before I noticed that they are maintained by
Stuart. (I could check these two in, too.)

Please remove redundant bindings yourself, or give me permission
to do it, or do it in your next update (the sooner the better).

But *iff* you need to redefine global bindings while keeping the
meaning, then please also use the common <desc>. Don't use
"Propeller Fine" when everyone else uses "Propeller finer".
These descriptions are automatically extracted and listed
in $FG_ROOT/Docs/Input/keyboard/map.pdf and can't be grouped
properly otherwise. (<desc> in <help> blocks are not concerned,
only those in key definitions.)

m.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to