On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 18:02 -0700, Dave Perry wrote: > I am not sure the new patch is giving the > same results, but I have not done any controlled comparisons;... I will > double check and compare some examples with the previous patch. > I was wrong. Both are giving the same results, much improved indicated altitude for various QNH even at Lake Co @ 9928 ft. field elvation.
TABLE OF RESULTS (rounded to nearest ft.) QNH 1st Patch 2nd Patch Field Elevation Airport 29.92 5019 5019 5052 2V2 29.64 5019 5019 5052 2V2 29.86 9887 9886 9928 KLXV 30.32 9914 9914 9928 KLXV 28.00 9764 9764 9928 KLXV 29.74 9879 9879 9928 KLXV 29.74 6502 6502 6540 KEGE -- Dave Perry ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
