On Thursday 22 February 2007 14:02, John Denker wrote: > ++ Some of us (not all, of course) would like to get FG to the > point where it would be usable as a procedures trainer. This > requires modeling the instruments "warts and all". As a start, > this includes modeling the nonidealities of the barometric > altimeter ... such as H-A-L-T among others.
Yes, obviously. Frankly I would be astonished if anyone at all didn't want FG's instrumentation to be as realistic and flexibly modelled as possible... I was just pointing out that if one wants instant "magical" readouts of exact altitude, AFAICS it's already easily available in the property tree. I'll be pleased to see your improved altimeter etc committed when it's ready... I get a constant trickle of bug reports about the Lightning altimeter which stops going up long before the a/c itself does! Cheers, AJ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
