John Denker writes:
> On 03/03/2007 12:32 PM, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>
>> hxx:
>> + virtual void Init();
>> cxx:
>> +void FGATC::Init() {
>> +// This should never be called, since each derived class will have its
>> own
>> +// Init() that overrides this one.
>> +}
>>
>> So, why are you adding it?!
>
> Perhaps because the code wouldn't be correct without it?!
then make in a pure virtual function in the header file.
virtual void Init()=0;
this way every derived class will have to implement it but there is no
definition in the base class.
--alex--
--
| I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active |
| advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with |
| automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion |
| and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
