Hi Jim,

Jim Campbell wrote:

> Some discussions have already taken place on JSBsim devel mailing list 
> regards communication between "modules" of flightgear.

Indeed, the idea of cutting FlightGear into modules is not a new one
and has been floating around way before this nice "new arcitecture"
paper came up that everybody takes as a reference.

Using some sort of networked database is a nice start and definitely
honours the idea of portability - yet I don't see such thing that is
capable of handling data at a rate that meets the requirements of
FlightGear. OpenLDAP as well as MySQL are very bad at handling a high
rate of concurrent read/write requests - they miss the target by a huge
distance, they both are faaar to complex (even MySQL :-)  for such a
task.

Personally I think some thing like distributed shared memory might fill
the gap. I've been doing some literature research on this topic several
years ago, the idea looks pretty promising and different OpenSource
implementations already have been around by that time - but I would not
like to be the one to debug such a tricky beast ....  :-)

Cheers,
        Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to