Tim Moore wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Laurence Vanek wrote: > >> gh.robin wrote: >> >>> On Sun 12 August 2007 19:10, Laurence Vanek wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Laurence Vanek wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> reply to myself. >>>> >>>> This problem still exists as of 30 minutes ago when I did fresh svn >>>> update of OSG & rebuilds of simgear + FG. >>>> >>>> At presnt FG does not build from cvs head for me. Anyone else see this? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> According to that, was previously said, there is a "closed minded" >>> way >>> the stable OSG version 2.0 >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Gérard >>> >>> > I've committed a fix so that FlightGear will again compile with OSG 2.1.4, as > well > as older versions. > >>> >>> >> ok.........not sure I understand what you are saying. I have been >> building OSG with the "non-closed mind" version for some time now >> without much trouble. >> >> I dont normally inhabit the devel list since I am a user not a >> developer. It would appear to me that the developers would be more than >> a little concerned with this issue. >> > Well, no. OSG SVN moves very rapidly and making sure that FlightGear always > compiles > against the latest and greatest OSG is not a priority. > > Tim > Thanks for the fix.
There have been times in the past when the reverse was true, i.e. needing to build the latest OSG to compile the latest FG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
