On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:58:45AM +0200, Lukas Mesani wrote:
> Good work! :-)
> Did anyone speak with VATSIM/IVAO people about this ? :)

I don't think so... as I heard they are focused on their own protocoll.
But why to create the overhead of implementing non-standard operations
if there is an open and stable client and server implementation :-) ?

I think I will contact them and ask them if they will take a look at
fgcom.

Regards, Holger

-- 
#####  #### ##  ##   Holger Wirtz         Phone : (+49 30) 884299-40
##  ## ##   ### ##   DFN-Verein           Fax   : (+49 30) 884299-70
##  ## #### ######   Stresemannstr. 78    E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
##  ## ##   ## ###   10963 Berlin
#####  ##   ##  ##   GERMANY              WWW   : http://www.dfn.de
GPG-Fingerprint: ABFA 1F51 DD8D 503C 85DC  0C51 E961 79E2 6685 9BCF

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to