On mer 21 novembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Stuart
>

> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Providing an easy way to make the Nimitz more MP-compatible
> > is an excellent idea. However, I have two comments on the
> > implementation:
> >
> > 1) I think splitting the dialog into two - one for AI/ATC and
> > one for carrier settings would be a good idea. From the
> > user's perspective, they are really two separate functions
> > and there are now sufficient carrier functions to make this
> > worthwhile. It might also be worth including buttons for
> > engaging the launchbar, and even firing the catapult. This
> > will also allow us to hide the carrier menu if the carriers
> > are not enabled.
> >
> > 2) The dialog currently is very specific to the Nimitz and
> > its current location. I think it would be a good idea to
> > instead provide controls for any number of carriers, or at
> > least controls that will reset _all_ carriers to their
> > default position. This may require a bit of re-jigging of the
> > carrier scenarios so that their initial positions etc are
> > accessible, but will give a lot more flexibility as the
> > number of carriers increase.
> >
> > I realize that this has just trebled the workload for your
> > enhancement, but I think that both these things will make it
> > much more useful.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > -Stuart
>
> As an ergonomic issue here - I would prefer not to try to juggle with mouse
> and joystick to either engage the launchbar or fire the catapult - the
> keyboard is a better option. I know there are some who can manage that, but
> I'm not one of them.
>
> Otherwise, this is all good stuff, and as the co-author of the original
> carrier stuff would be very willing to add the final version to cvs.
>
> Only temporarily, mind. We have been talking about doing the carrier (and
> other ai objects) over mp for years now. Perhaps some time soon ...
>
>
> Vivian
>
>
Hello Stuart, 

I fully agree with Vivian , about the launchbar and catapult,
 would you accept to UP or DOWN the landing gear with the menu ? , 
to me it is the same ergonomic requirement.

Which explain my previous reaction regarding the keyboard modification test 
(thanks to David Megginson, who came back to the previous old keyboard 
configuration)

Regards

-- 
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to