Hi All, The number of aircraft in CVS continue to grow at a quite incredible rate. We now have over 170, and there aren't enough hours in the day to fly all of them the amount of time that they really deserve. I haven't graphed the number of new aircraft per month, but it certainly feels that not a day goes by without a new aircraft directory being created in the CVS logs.
This is a wonderful problem to have, but does mean that running "cvs up" on the /data directory can take an age, and the amount of data in the data package in its entirety is quite large. I wonder if it would be worth moving all the aircraft to a separate repository. I think this might have a number of advantages: 1) Clearer separation between the core code and the aircraft custom code. 2) Easier administration of CVS write access - it should be pretty straightforward to give those who maintain a given aircraft write access to their own aircraft. 3) Easier "cvs up" for those with a slow connection, or not much time. No need to update all the aircraft all the time.* -Stuart * Yes, I'm sure there is a way to write some .cvs file so that the Aircraft tree is ignored, but I feel there should be an easier way. ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it now. http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel