-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Curtis Olson wrote: > On Nov 30, 2007 1:23 AM, Melchior FRANZ <> wrote: > >> The problem that I have/had is that you don't say it openly, when you >> make such a decision -- that you will call it 1.0, which aircraft it >> will contain etc. All we got was a cryptic hint with tongue in cheek, >> instead of an "I will make the next release 1.0, because ... (And while >> you can, of course, discuss it, it's already decided."). It's only >> in private messages where one gets some more info. > > > I'm just a little surpised that the version number is such a contentious > issue. It seems like there are more important battles to fight. How about > we at least agree to skip 0.9.11 out of sensitivity to a very large group of > people. > As timore said on IRC: <timoore> "If we skip 0.9.11, then the terrorists have won"
I can't agree more... It is just a number and they should in my experience follow some logic: 0.9.10 -> 0.10 = Ok 0.9.10 -> 0.11 = Not Ok 0.9.10 -> 0.9.10.1 = Ok 0.9.10 -> 0.9.10.2 = Not Ok 0.9.10 -> 0.9.11 = Ok 0.9.10 -> 1.0 = Ok (but other issues as mfranz pointed out, I agree with him about landing lights) In other words: Either: Add one to any part and reset all parts after it to 0 Or: Add an extra part, with a 0 or 1. Never : Add 2 or anything else. Regards, AnMaster -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHUAvsWmK6ng/aMNkRCiYfAKCaCQTeKW/PUEXUU0/6v4ZscpY1vwCfc4cY RsDGp9dtijDdUq97hOVW4QE= =aCfd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
