gerard robin wrote:
> On sam 8 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>   
>> * Durk Talsma -- Saturday 08 December 2007:
>>     
>>> Based on all the input sofar, I'd like to propose the following list of
>>> aircraft for inclusion in the next release:
>>>       
>> Looks good. Not trying to say anything particular -- just FYI:
>>
>>   20M     787
>>   20M     A-10
>>   26M     bf109
>>   3.2M    bo105*
>>   84K     c172
>>   1.9M    c172p
>>   6.4M    SenecaII
>>   8.5M    dhc2
>>   5.9M    b1900d
>>   12M     Lightning
>>   1.2M    j3cub
>>   13M     seahawk
>>   12M     p51d
>>   1.8M    pa28-161
>>   13M     bocian
>>   600K    ufo*
>>   9.5M    bleriot-XI
>>
>>   + one of those
>>   2.5M    T38
>>   9.9M    PBY-Catalina
>>   17M     SR71-BlackBird
>>
>>
>> * ... a bit less, actually, as this includes files that only I have
>>
>> The bleriot is very nice, much nicer than the wright. But its FDM
>> is a bit ... ummm ... well, the engine is quite powerful and the
>> aircraft allows some aerobatics, which the real one probably didn't  ;-)
>>
>> m.
>>     
>
> About the Bleriot i fully agree with Melchior, the FDM could "make laugh" 
> versus the Wright,
>
> However i am sure that somebody, here, very aware with YASim could could give 
> to that wonderful plane an FDM which is at the right level ( roll, lift, 
> engine power, may be drag).
>
>
>   
I took a look at the bleriot-XI-yasim.xml last night.  The dimensions in 
this file do not match the .ac file.  After some time with google 
looking for specifications, I found a few very good sources.  The wing 
span in the .ac file is for the final configuration, not the channel 
crossing configuration.  The .ac has the 3 cylinder Anzani engine (rated 
23 - 25 hp on various sites at 1450 rpm).  Also the wing incidence in 
the specs is 7 degrees which the yasim solver had a lot of trouble 
doing.  The cruise with this engine was only 36 mph and only 48 with the 
50 hp gnome rotary.  I also found the 22 mile channel crossing took 36.5 
min which implies a 47 mph ground speed (10 mph tail wind perhaps).

Anyway, I was able to get much more realistic performance with some 
experimenting using the above data.  I am not satisfied yet as I still 
cannot get sufficient elevator trim and convergence with the 7 degree 
incidence.  I should have a satisfying config file by this weekend.

I don't want to offend the originator of this beautiful model.  So I 
ask, is it OK to submit a bleriot-XI-yasim.xml file that better matches 
the specifications ?

-Dave Perry


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to