-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 First: Please don't hijack a thread like you did. Most clients that allow displaying threaded view of messages don't base it on subject but on other, normally hidden headers (that are more reliable normally, unless someone hijack the thread like you did). So when you created this message by hitting reply to "Re: [Flightgear-devel] valgrind: diff no 1" you mess up that thread sort.
Just hit the button/menu option/whatever to create a new mail and put in the address of the mailing list in "to". Regards, Arvid Norlander Daniyar Atadjanov wrote: > Hi, > > i'm newbie in FG development (just subscribed to this mailing list) and in > C/C++ programming, but i'm interested in making > FG's ATC more usefull and realistic. > > I learned the code and read comments in /src/ATC/* files and have some ideas > about adding new interesting features to FG's > ATC. > > This (attached) diff fixes only two (little) bugs in Tower-ATC: > > 1. Sometimes ATC tells you to follow yourself when you report Downwind, > like: "GFS, number two, follow GFS on > base/final/other leg". > 2. When ATC tells you to go around because of traffic, but that traffic is > you! > > > My ideas (something of this i already wrote and there's a code): > > 1. Requesting weather codition in airport. Some airports don't have ATIS, > so you can ask ATC: "Please advise weather > condition" and ATC answers: active runway, wind heading and speed, > visibility, QFE... > 2. When aircraft requests landing, pilot says: "for full stop with ATIS", > but in reallife he must say: "information > Bravo/Charlie/Delta/etc". I added this changes to FG. > 3. Now ATC knows only two answers when requesting landing: "report > straight-in" and "report downwind". What about other > legs, turns and vectoring? Like: "Turn left heading 120 degrees until > advised" or "Turn right heading 10 degrees for landing > runway 28R, report final" ? > 4. Then i added some checkings of landing gear position and when reporting > final pilot can say: "Gear down, ready to > land". > 5. If you forgot gear on final, ATC can report you: "Your landing gear > appears up". > > But this is a very little changes. What about other new feature to make ATC > more realistic? > > Please tell your ideas and advices about adding changes to ATC. What would > you like to see in FG's ATC? > > Thank you and sorry for my bad English :) > > Best, > Daniyar -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHkgDlWmK6ng/aMNkRCoNyAJsF+TG0mjF3lvT93+fZYpUqfHNpbACcDDAh Bhq6aey6cOYN4AV+mNtZhZY= =X7UH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
