Thanks for the processing chain. I'll see if I find some time to look into this in the weekend. Lots of other data processing (ant distributions, butterfly breathing, etc.) on the bench already... :)
My main idea is not to develop a complicated model. I rather try to find some complicated filtering in the hope, that the remaining data gives a simple model that's better than the conservative setting. Given the raw data quality in the metar everything else would be overkill regarding 'realism'. On the other hand maybe aiming for 'geotypical' is better than 'georealistic' (in a more general sense -> scenery, random objects.... ) Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
