On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:22:33 +0200 Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Thursday 05 June 2008: > > Does this will be compatible with actual JSBSim development ? > > No, it will get overwritten with the next JSBSim update. There's > a reason why commits to externally maintained parts of fgfs (nasal, > jsbsim) used to be taboo, just like commits to parts which are > strictly maintained by a single person or small group (YASim). > (UIUC may no longer belong to either group, as it seems to be > unmaintained.) > > The right thing would have been to ask the responsible maintainers, > to have them make the changes in their repositories, and then to > forward port that. But then again, times change, and maybe all that > is no longer true ... > > m. I never got the memo that large parts of the tree were off limits. I agree that a substantive change should be vetted by "owners" first, but I don't really see the point for fairly cosmetic changes. On the other hand, why is JSBSim in our CVS at all if new versions are brought in in this way? Tim ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
