* Durk Talsma -- Saturday 04 October 2008: > Given that we have an OSG branch that has undergone significant > development this year, and a PLIB branch, with little or no > development, I would strongly urge that the main release would > be OSG based.
I agree. The PLIB branch was only kept alive for a short time after the 1.0 release, just for the case that we missed some really bad bugs and needed to make a bugfix release. Making another release from that would be rather pointless, and not help to convince people that fgfs is not "dead". Rather the opposite. > PLIB based maintenance release: 1.0.1 > OSG based main release: 1.1.0 (or 1.2.0) I like the idea of an 1.9 release from the OSG branch. This makes clear that it's one step before a major release 2.0, and that there were fundamental changes (additions and also temporary losses). We could easily explain why clouds/shadows are missing there, and it might attract new developers who are interested and knowledgable in OSG. Also, the multiscreen feature could attract developers from institutions/companies who need that for their simulators. m. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
