Durk Talsma wrote:
> Ideally, I need to go through this ground network once more and do some fine
> adjustment.
Oh, no, please don't waste your time. Better let us have a 'correct'
(TM) taxiway layout first before making any other related changes.
Do you remember the heated discussion about the light-poles at KSFO,
before we had the 1.0.0 release ? Some people had been throwing really
ugly words at the discussion (no, I don't remember the names of the
posters) - and the poor guy who had been placing the poles to the best
of his knowledge finally felt highly irritated.
Now that we have terminal buildings which are much more accurate than
our earlier ones, almost all of these light pole placements make quite
a lot of sense.
In short: Let's _always_ try to fix the underlying geometry before
beding add-on's to an incorrect layout.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
