On jeudi 30 octobre 2008, Csaba Halász wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:27 PM, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  to me,  two possibilities, nobody here,  knows the answer  OR my
> > questions are too stupid to get any answer ( my feeling goes to that
> > explanation )
>
> We know you are not stupid.
> You are right, current rain/snow ignores the rendering setting.

Thanks, for both answers  :)
The first one  gives me some courage  to go on :). 

My first whish,   is to avoid ( when needed) the rain with a specific 
property.

Later on ,  i wonder on how to modify the rain "eye candy"  which look like 
more snow,  than rain ( too slow when falling , too big size ).

Why do you we keep into preferences.xml these unuseful precipitation 
property   ?

Cheers

-- 
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/

J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la santé. 
Voltaire


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to