Melchior FRANZ ha scritto: > There could be no doubt about the legal status of the screenshots > displayed on our webpage. If there's no explicit license, then they > are automatically protected by national copyright law in countries > which signed the Berne Convention. But we *want* that they be used > in articles and reviews about FlightGear, so we have to give > explicit permission for that. > > I've written down on a wiki page what should IMHO be made clear in > ..... > I agree with what is written on that page, especially this part: Screenshots should only show features that are actually available to the public, not models that are private and can't be distributed due to a non-GPL-compatible, restrictive license etc.
But I think that it would be much easier to impose a particular creative common license from these: http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/meet-the-licenses (I think that by-nd should be reasonable good) or even using one of these: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Upload (You must be logged in to reach this page). -- Brisa Francesco Via Gabelli 16 22077 Olgiate Comasco (CO) http://brisa.homelinux.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] ________ ______ / ____/ / / ____/___ ____ ___ ____ / / __/ / ______ / / / __ \/ __ `__ \/ __ \ / /_/ / /___ /_____/ / /___/ /_/ / / / / / / /_/ / \____/_____/ \____/\____/_/ /_/ /_/\____/ http://www.gl-como.it My public gpg key: http://minsky.surfnet.nl:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC67DC12DC4361693 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
