On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:03 AM, James Turner wrote:

>
> On 30 Dec 2008, at 09:51, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
>
> > Looking initially at the atis.cxx, ATCmgr.cxx, etc code I notice a
> > bunch
> > of commented-out "cout" statements, which give me a good idea of where
> > to look for solutions.  I wonder if there is a case for introducing
> > a -v
> > (--verbose) option for turning all occurences these statements ON
> > via an
> > IFDEF condition. Suggestions on where to introduce such a condition
> > welcome. I would be willing to undertake the "grunt" work. Long live
> > find/grep/sed.
>
> (sadly I can't offer much useful advice on the radios front, but as a
> more general thing:)
>
> We already have this, it's the SG_LOG() mechanism, which wraps a C++
> iostream (like cout) with a module and level parameters. You can set
> the log-level in various ways (eg, from .fgfsrc) or using --log-level
> on the command line. By default, SG_ALERT is shown - the 'lower'
> levels are warning, info, bulk and debug.
>
> The problem is, there's code which uses INFO where it should probably
> use BULK or DEBUG, and so info is a a bit much to deal with, and BULK
> is more or less impossible (interactively). It's fine for recording to
> a text file and then grep-ing / sed-ing of course.
>
> Also, for any of these lines, we pay all the string manipulation
> penalty regardless of the whether the message is logged or not. In
> some code this cost is potentially significant, especially inside
> loops. (One I just killed: the apt loader was looking each line in the
> file to BULK as it read it)
>
> My personal feeling is that DEBUG should be for debugging, i.e removed
> once the code in question is in a stable, and that longer term we
> should be considering what BULK is really useful for. Being able to
> grep/sed/find in logs is nice, but finding a way to avoid the runtime
> cost when the messages are suppressed (which is 99.99....% of the
> time) would be equally nice :)


Originally this scheme was designed to completely collapse out of the code
when not in use, but I'm not sure if that feature has been maintained over
the years.

Curt.
-- 
Curtis Olson: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to