On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Geoff McLane <ubu...@geoffair.info> wrote:
>
> So while using the macro WIN32, meaning NOT unix, might be appropriate
> for MINGW, but not _WIN32 unless the Mingw compiler also has this
> predefine, it is also my understanding that this may mess with CYGWIN
> building, but not sure on this... Maybe someone who uses and understands
> the cygwin environment could comment on this.

mingw does define WIN32, _WIN32, __WIN32 and even __WIN32__ for good
measure. I picked _WIN32 exactly because MSDN said that's the one
predefined by MSVC as well and thus can be used to detect the platform
without any headers included. Compiler-specific constructs (pragmas,
attributes, etc) should still be conditional on _MSC_VER, of course.

No idea about cygwin, but I guess these macros should only be defined
when using the windows headers/dlls and not when using the cygwin
layer. That would suit us fine, but we shall wait for a confirmation.

-- 
Csaba/Jester

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to