On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > * Curtis Olson -- Sunday 05 April 2009: >> Without seeing anything so far that I would consider a compelling >> argument against, I vote for giving Tim the green light here. >> Developer convenience has almost always been a good enough reason >> in the past. > > OK. Unfortunately, this is a route that I can't go with the project. > I better watch that from outside. I still claim ownership of the bo105 > and will probably continue maintaining it after a longer pause (if I > can keep my commit rights until then). All other areas that I maintained > are free for adoption (gui, fg/nasal, new hud, voice, input). >
So essentially since you may not get your way, you're going to take your ball and go home? WTF? g. -- Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007 http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind. OpenQM - A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes. http://gpl.openqm.com - Get it _today_! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
