On 12 Sep 2009, at 14:06, Torsten Dreyer wrote: > I only had time for a single ILS approach at my home base with the > Seneca. I > felt pretty comfortable with the new implementation. I noticed two > little > glitches: > The has-gs property does not go to false if you switch from an ILS > frequency > to a VOR frequency. Probably something like > has_gs_node->setBoolValue(false); > is needed near line 802 in navradio.cxx.
Cheers, that's a simple bug, I'll get it fixed. > > And the glideslope indicator quickly (many times per second) moves > between > to-high and to-low indication when you are very close to the antenna > below > 50-100ft above threshold. I havn't investigated this in detail but > these are > probably the modeled side lobes which are naturally very close to > each other > so close to the station? I think this part needs some tuning, > because I have > never observed something like that in reality. Yeah, the behaviour close to the ground is weird, but partly related to the penaltyForNav problem of the reverse ILS being selected. It's not the only problem though. Thanks for the testing! James ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
