Pete Morgan wrote:
> Glad you picked the 787, this is broken in CVS with all sorts of
> errors.. thats why We need an aircraft fault list...
I would not call it "broken", instead, call it "incomplete". To my
opinion we're never going to have any aircraft in FlightGear complying
with the term "finished", there will always be features missing, simply
because it's just a simulation.
Having different levels of "completeness" is the nature of Open
development and I'm pretty much convinced that the respective authors
are well aware of the deficiencies, as they already did a lot of
research on the respective type of aircraft.
If you think that a "fault list" is going to motivate more developers
to jump into improving the fleet, then please go ahead and start
compiling such list, including detailed or at least reasonable reports
about what's missing - "all sorts of errors" is insufficient - and, at
best, how it should be improved.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
