On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Alasdair Campbell <ali...@btinternet.com> wrote: > And I will feel a lot > happier when the day comes that a contributer makes a decent attempt to > test his work before abusing his privilege to commit untested and > questionable work to CVS.
CVS is for developing stuff. For testing and review one needs to publish the new code somewhere. You can't expect it to be in perfect order all the time. Erik *has* tried to reproduce the reported problems but some just didn't happen for him. Especially with the various versions of OpenAl out there that have caused trouble before, I certainly feel he has made a "decent attempt to test his work". If we will have a better sound system after a few weeks of development, that's fine with me, even if it includes some detours or dead-ends. Maybe you should take a little vacation ;) I hope your comments will not discourage Erik and other potential contributors. We need more developers not less. On a related note, I think it is time to put GIT on the official agenda again. That way it would be easy for interested parties to test new code. -- Csaba/Jester ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
