On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:25:57 -0000, Vivian wrote in message <6e5e9a144a174d9c84057da9eff57...@main>:
> Tom, > > > > I don't think there is anything particularly wrong with your > suggestion, just that it does not meet the original remit, which was > to be able to ignore players who were not following the "rules", > either intentionally or through ignorance. > > > > We already almost have what you propose with ports 5000/5002. Which > reminds me: IIRC 5001 is reserved for telnet. We rarely use 5002 for > development nowadays, so I suppose there is nothing stopping a bunch > of like-minded guys using that. However, I just have a final > reservation - MP was meant to be the global picture of the airspace - > not just a part. > > > > That said perhaps we do need a ban/kick/ignore like IRC for MP. We > have stepped around this issue in the past. ..in the GNU spirit; Why not simply _use_ IRC for FG MP??? It'll be fast paced etc alright, but it allows e.g. #FG-ATC, #FG-newbies, #FG-dogfight etc, e.g. on the same ports we use now. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
