John Denker wrote:
> On 12/20/2009 06:35 AM, Martin Spott wrote:
>>> Fix for Martin: tolerate runway-associated navaids with a bogus ICAO/runway
>>> ident.
>>
>> Thanks a lot, works as advertized,
>
> To facilitate testing, could somebody please provide
> a list of (some or all of) the navaids that fall into
> this category?
Pulling the 'Navaids/' directory from the current CVS Base package
should serve as an unambiguous test. I didn't bother compiling a list
of affected airfields, but if you like to have one, you could do that
yourself by comparing the airfields from the 'nav.dat' file (I think
types 4-9 are revelant) against those from the 'apt.dat',
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
