Hi,
> > With the aircraft I test with, that's what I see - the > C172, the Seneca, the B1900 and, to a lesser degree, the > 777-200 (though it has some other problems). I guess the > problem may be, that all of those aircraft have quite well > developed, non-generic autopilots. Unfortunately they are only few ones.... > > Aside from the GPS setting true-heading-hold when it > shouldn't, what problems are people seeing with heading-hold > and nav1-hold? > > Please let me know the specific aircraft, steps to > reproduce, expected behaviour and actual behaviour. I will > assume people are testing with latest data/ and FG/SG > sources. > > Regards, > James I can't use the latest data and sources, but just as compare and help: 737-300 (Using the autopilot.panel via F11)- in 19.1 the 737-300 was the airliner with the best autopilot behavior recommended for ILS-approaches done by ap. with my last built from 11/27/2009 the aircraft didn't responded anymore on NAV1-Hold and GS. Cheers HHS P.S.:I'm beware of that the actually 737-300 needs a own written flightdirector like the Citation Bravo and other aircrafts from Syd has to be real - but how to write one? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
