Martin Spott wrote: > Curtis Olson wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Martin Spott wrote some stuff about the web >> page: > >> Pete and I agreed (I think) that we probably don't want to ultimately do the >> official flightgear web site as a google apps engine page. That locks us >> into a closed source, proprietary situation for the web site. > > As already elaborated here, using the Django API on Google App Engine > will result in a nicely portable site. Please dont't try to make us > believe that there's just black and white, it's just not true.
Also, it's just the site. Creating the basics for a new site is less work than recreating FlightGear itself. (I know that setting up a complete site can be a huge task but the site for FlightGear could in essence just be a bunch of links). I wouldn't worry on vendor lock too much for webservices. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
