Curtis Olson wrote:
[... airport elevation ...]
> Judging by the total lack of end user comments in this area, I think we
> ended up with a pretty good balance of naturally fitting a nice surface to
> the terrain data and blending it into the surrounding terrain.
Agreed.
> The system is automated though so it's not always perfect and I'm sure there
> are airports that could use some tweaking. One idea that I had (and haven't
> acted on) was to allow specifying a set of "fit parameters" for individual
> airports where the default parameters didn't do a good job.
This is most prominently interesting for airstrips like LFLJ
(Courchevel) which has a slope of slightly below 20 %. An appropriate
procedure is already planned - but not yet implemented.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
