On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Heiko Schulz <aeitsch...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> What I wonder- if David Megginson gave permission- why we have now the same > aircraft with two different models in CVS? One named "j3cub" and one named > "Cub". No, pull the old one. It was a lot of fun to build, and was (I think) our second taildragger, when we were still figuring out how to model gear, but there's no reason to keep it around now. I'd love to make this new model our default aircraft, as the real J3 has been for so many tens of thousands of new student pilots historically, but the taildragger thing might scare away users. A couple of queries about the (most excellent) new model: 1. Shouldn't there be some kind of an inclinometer (slip-skid ball) on the panel? I think I've seen one in most J3 panel photos, and it's pretty useful. 2. Where's the black lightning bolt on the side? (That's just a joke -- I actually think it's cool that we're not following the cliché here). All the best, David ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
