While I cant test myself , (fg isn't playing nice at the moment) , in a lot of cases transparent "covers" need to be disabled for an animation behind it to be visible , so I'm guessing there was a good reason to do that in the first place ... just my 2 cents. Cheers
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:45 PM, HB-GRAL <flightg...@sablonier.ch> wrote: > HB-GRAL schrieb: > > Heiko Schulz schrieb: > >> The same for the landinglight. > >> > > Merge request for the landing light: > > --- a/Aircraft/c172p/Models/c172p.xml > +++ b/Aircraft/c172p/Models/c172p.xml > @@ -2259,18 +2259,6 @@ > <property>controls/lighting/landing-lights</property> > </condition> > </animation> > - > - <animation> > - <type>select</type> > - <object-name>landinglightcover</object-name> > - <condition> > - <not> > - <property>controls/lighting/landing-lights</property> > - </not> > - </condition> > - </animation> > - > - > > Thanks - Y. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
