On 10/13/2010 10:59 AM, Vivian Meazza wrote: > Martin Spott wrote: > > >> Curtis Olson wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Martin Spott wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hi, the page: >>>> >>>> http://www.flightgear.org/announce.html#v2.0.0 >>>> >>>> says: "Version 2.0.0 [...] is primarily a bug fix release". I don't >>>> think this holds true ;-) >>>> >>>> >>> I'm open to suggestions for more appropriate verbiage. :-) >>> >> Well, in case of doubt I'd probably just ask those people, who decided >> that >> it's been worth incrementing the major release number for this very relase >> - >> they should know best ;-) >> >> > This is yesterday's question. Perhaps today's question should be: "What > should we call the next release? And when is it planned?" > > I think that it might be considered that the differences (at least in the > visual aspects) between 2.0.0 and the current Git/Head already exceed those > between 1.9.1 and 2.0.0. > > Vivian > Sounds to me like it would be worth investing time in finding an answer to 'what is our release cycle' as this would answer the 2 questions: 'what is the next release' (in terms of version numbering) and also 'when is it planned'
Nathanael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
