On Feb 10, 2011, at 8:09 AM, Geoff McLane wrote: > On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 19:51 +0000, Martin Spott wrote: >> I have seen this on various asphalt runways as well... > > Well, I just experimented by editing apt.dat.gz, and > inverted the 'surface' numbers - made the 4204 ft > runway 15x a 4, and the short 08x 1902 a 5, and no more > tilting ;=)) so far... > > One might argue that 'Gravel' (5) should be 'harder' > than 'Dirt' (4) in the 810 spec, and that 'Turf/grass' > (3) should be softer than than either Gravel or Dirt, > but perhaps that is a question for Robin Peel. > > Anyway, this fixed it so I can watch for those pesky > kangaroos hopping around ;=)) > > Regards, > > Geoff. >
Geoff, interesting this would fix it, as I don't see the 172 having any surface interaction built in. After seeing your post yesterday I spawned into YGIL and attempted to duplicate the sinking on both 33, 26, and any surface, to no avail. I've also not seen it on any asphalt runways as Martin mentioned. Have you found it to be exclusive to the 172p, or other aircraft as well? Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
