> But you have broken my patch! :) Apologies! It's been a busy week and I tried to commit smart fixes between long work-days. Obviously not a good idea ;-)
> Also, Anders pointed out that more tanks may be needed even if they > are not (yet) in the property tree, so ultimately the FDM should be > consulted. I wouldn't want to do that. Each FDM handles tanks in a different way and I don't like the idea of implementing an individual query for JSBSim, yasim and all other known (and probably unknown) FDM. The idea behind the tank- properties class is to have a generic handling of fuel weight/mass/volume and not to depend on the FDM implementation. I'd prefer to ask the aircraft designer to at least set num-tanks to have the required tanks created. Torsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
