Hi there! After having followed the trademark discussion silently, I start to feel like Alice in Trademark-Wonderland.
Most companies, and RedBull for sure, invest a lot of money for TV and print commercials. So WTF should the Flightgear Project do commercials for them FOR FREE? RedBull should pay Jack for creating the livery, and Flightgear for adding it to the release. Welcome to Utopia! In reality, FG takes the risk of being sued and even pays for the bandwidth. Sweet! I suggest to populate the scenery with advertisement boards, too. For free, of course. World economy needs your help! And lawyers would be gratefull, too... Seriously, who should be interested more in inclusion of trademarks to flightgear - the project itself, or the company behind the trademark? I for myself could perfectly life without any (RedBull) logos attached to any aircraft. Cheers, Joe -- Schon gehört? GMX hat einen genialen Phishing-Filter in die Toolbar eingebaut! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/toolbar ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
