On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Chris O'Neill <chrison...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> Wait a minute! If we're going to "look the other way" and breach > someone else's trademark rights, then why would we get "snotty" with > someone who breaches our copyright? It seems a bit hypocritical to me. > >> I don't know, I haven't researched >> it, but shoveling a problem around is not solving it. > > I agree, but removing trademarks from the "official" FG distribution > doesn't "shovel the problem" but, rather, removes the Project's risk and > places it exactly where it should be placed... solely on the author of > the livery. If Mack Jermod (or anyone else for that matter) wants a Red > Bull (or any other trademark) on their livery, then so be it but let > Mack Jermod (and the others) distribute it themselves and assume any and > all risk, not the FG Project! > ... > > Regards, > > Chris The man's name is Jack Mermod. While I may not declare for any position here, when taking a position it seems discourteous, unnecessary and counter-persuasive to make sport of someone's name. -Gary aka Buckaroo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
