On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 14:54:40 +0200, Erik wrote in message <1302008080.6099.1.camel@Raptor>:
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 14:35 +0200, kreuzritter2000 wrote: > > No the base package belongs to the FG community and you commited > > your work under their "GPLv2 or later" conditions. > > > > If the FG community decides to switch to GPLv3 one day, the > > community can do this without asking you for permission. > > Incorrect, ..disagreed. > the copyright still belongs to me. ..agreed, nobody is disputing your copyright, the (non?)issue here is your own conflicting statements of how you _meant_ to license your own work, and how you actually _did_ license your own work. ;o) ..once you understand your own licensing ;o), you become able to make an informed decision on it. > GPL2 just makes it easier. ..disagreed, and you may want to read the history behind the GPLv3, the GPLv2 has holes that the GPLv3 plugs. ..the only thing I like better with GPLv2, is the owner's right to deny bad people permission to any further use of your code, this was considered "the major obstacle to business use" of GPLv2, but people like tSCOG, Microsoft etc deserves such bans, but escape them "once they are back in compliance" under GPLv3, under GPLv2 they also need to beg forgiveness and to beg for a new license. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xperia(TM) PLAY It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. And it wants your games. http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
