Geoff McLane wrote:
> I know and read some, like Martin, want to go perhaps
> another direction, and that too is fine...
Well, what I am (we are) having in mind is to provide some sort of a
"scenery root node" to FlightGear in the way like you're typically
referencing OpenFlight scenarios. This _might_ lead to different
scenery formats in the long term but there's no reason which impedes
providing such a feature by replacing directory names and STG-files
with a slightly different 'metadata' infrastructure around the same
flavour of BTG-files we're using today.
This would at least serve as a start, simply by moving the Scenery
directory logic out of hard-coded source into the Scenery itself.
But until we're starting to target the directory logic, there are more
pressing issues to solve ....
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
