On Sat, 21 May 2011 17:04:33 +0100 (BST), Pierre wrote in message <379675.56250...@web29801.mail.ird.yahoo.com>:
> > Hello, > > > ...looks like you fell into that same trap yourself. ;o) > > > I'm not a English native speaker, but luckily I'm able to communicate > without Google translate. > But yes, I had trouble to understand what Mr. Baranger is really > meaning. > > I was actually refering to the sentence that he added another > aircraft and started to make two others and want to give much > pleasure(?). He seems to be quick adding aircraft- are they are > really all developed further and being usuable later? > In the whole context it sounded to me that a realistic aircraft, as > discussed here, wanted by those "1-2" person aren't a pleasure. > > Maybe a misunderstood. ..the whole "conflict" is a product of misunderstandings. Best cure is write in your own language if you need translation programs to read or write in the English language more than once a week. > >..the important ones to review, are those meant for inclusion into > > the release candidates, e.g. 2.0, 2.2, 2.4 etc, pull them with e.g. > > "git checkout -b releases/2.2.0 origin/releases/2.2.0" for both SG > > and FG, and you'll find far fewer and far better aircraft. ;o) > > http://wiki.flightgear.org/Building_Flightgear_-_Debian > > http://wiki.flightgear.org/Scripted_Compilation_on_Linux_Debian/Ubuntu > > http://wiki.flightgear.org/Building_FlightGear > > Thanks, I will take a look! > > > ...yup, is why and how this is a development project. ;o) > > Welcome aboard. > > > I read in the forum that the GIT-version(?) is actually the > developement version of FGFS and includes all aircraft in > developement. ..there is a non-development version of FG? ;o) Everything is here so anyone can see _how_ the buggy ones fail, and try fix them. > So if there is a release they will be add to the > Download page, am I right? ..if somebody puts it there, yes. ;o) > I expected a far smaller number of > aircraft in developement and of course I didn't expect that all > aircraft will be usuable as they are in developement. But not that > high number! That are about 200-300 aircraft altogether I guess, > which will hardly be usuable. ..define "useable", newbie, then consider the developer bait context. ;o) > As a newbie it looks like for me quantity stands over qualitity... > *blush* > How many new aircraft are added each year? How can I see which > aircraft has been developed more than other, which aircraft are more > realistic? ..try "fgfs --show-aircraft --min-status=production " .."--min-status={alpha,beta,early-production,production}" Allows you to define a minimum status level (=development status) for all listed aircraft > > So thanks for the welcome > > P.M. > > > P.S. I just noticed that this mail maybe fits more to the users-list, > I'm sorry! ..hush, we're fishing. ;o) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran developers boost performance applications - including clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
