Gene > > On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Vivian Meazza wrote: > > >> > > > > "This" is indeed more or less consistent with those opinions. Csaba > says: > > "For example, all the GUI stuff should be thrown out and left to a > > launcher/control console application." Gene says: "All the functionality > in > > the GUI could be provided in a stand-alone tool that talked to the > > simulator." Ron says that he supports Csaba. I said: "I'm > > happy to set this all up, and more, in a separate GUI." How is my view > > inconsistent? > > > > The one wrench in the works is aircraft (and their systems) that add > entries to the GUI menu items... >
If you can generate a better way, or even an alternate way - I'll look at it. Until then you're stuck with it. Vivian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
