> -----Original Message----- > From: AJ MacLeod [mailto:aj-li...@adeptopensource.co.uk] > Sent: 29 June 2011 12:51 > To: FlightGear developers discussions > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] A couple of random oddities > > On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:39:55 +0100 > Vivian Meazza wrote: > > > > * English Electric Lightning: I believe the plane should be able to > reach > > > Mach 2 around 36.000 ft in level flight - even in a descending > pattern, I > > > was never able to reach above Mach 1.7 - is there a problem with the > FDM? > > The author is inactive at the moment. Perhaps he can be persuaded to > give > > this fine model a bit of a work-over. > > The author is a bit too active, which sadly doesn't leave any time for > Flightgear :-( The instruments I'll try and fix myself, but do any JSBSim > experts have any ideas on what might have changed the behaviour of the FDM > model? It worked OK "before"... though I have no idea when that changed. > > Cheers, >
Good to see that you're busy in RL, but not too busy to ignore FG completely. I've just pushed Ron's update to the JSBSim config. It needs quite a bit of up-elevator trim to maintain the cruise at 36000 ft, so there might be something else not quite right, but it will do M2.0 at 36000 ft. Regards, Vivian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
