On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:59:11 -0700, Alex wrote in message 
<CAEwz7jsynVp9izpjcfFs45Ez3cbTUV1YJnyArUnALaKzEcgG=w...@mail.gmail.com>:

> To agree with Alan, but with some additional generalizations.
> 
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Alan Teeder <ajtee...@v-twin.org.uk>
> wrote:
> > When I ran the research flight simulator for a major aircraft
> > manufacturer in the UK (many moons ago when we still had such an
> > industry), we had a saying:-
> > "Ask 10 test pilots for their opinion, and you will get 10 different
> > answers"
> 
> 1.  IFR commercial pilot:  airspace is completely irrelevant as they
> fly the clearance from ATC, initially filed by another airline
> individual who is not a pilot.
> 2.  IFR general aviation pilot:  airspace is only of interest on the
> ground when designing a clearance request that will be typed into the
> web terminal.
> 3.  VFR commercial pilot:  Almost irrelevant as tends to operate in
> areas without airspace restrictions or with full ATC coordination on
> an ad-hoc basis.
> 4.  VFR cross country pilot:  Interested in airspace, but usually just
> wanting to know where it is, to fly far around it.
> 5.  VFR visiting pilot:  Intensely interested in airspace, wants the
> simulator to help him learn not to accidentally bump into it.
> 6.  VFR local pilot:  Probably has it memorized anyway, owns the chart
> mostly to be compliant with the rules.
> 7.  Antique / simple homebuilt pilot:  Doesn't have radios or the like
> anyway, simply needs a few circles marked 'mode C veil'.
> 8.  Military pilot:  Doesn't use civilian charts.  Could be fun to
> have the MTR details transcribed for simulating those fighters.
> 9.  Shuttle pilot:  I could ask if needed, but I suspect they count as
> [2] since they're in class A airspace until the final brick-like
> landing.
> 10.  Aerobatic pilot:  The boxes.  And something on the simulator to
> be sarcastic when you accidentally leave the box.
> 11.  RC pilot:  No idea.  Curt?
> 12.  ... who is missing from the list?

..13. FPV pilot
14. Drone pilot (or operator (to open another coupla cans of ...))


> From: HB-GRAL
> > To improve our map resources with further data I started an
> > experiment with free available airspace data. Actually this is far
> > from being a good map and finished design, it is just a start to
> > implement (unofficial!) airspace information:
> > http://maptest.fgx.ch/navaid.html
> 
> Lovely, keep up the good work.  The comments above are intended to
> clarify and not discourage.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
> contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
> security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this
> data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> Flightgear-devel mailing list
> Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to